Clarifying user request

The user posted a Chinese sentence about candidates for the 2025 Chinese Golden Gloves, mentioning goalkeepers like Liu Dianzuo and Yan Junling. I’m not sure what specific information they want—perhaps a summary, verification, or details? I think it would be a good idea to ask a clarifying question or offer details like the full list of candidates, selection criteria, or past winners. Given my knowledge cutoff, I need to be cautious about confirming anything beyond that.Offering support and context
I want to provide a helpful response to the user regarding the headline. I should acknowledge it and ask what specific information they’re interested in—is it verification, a full list, details on the award, or something else? I could offer quick bios for the candidates, noting that they’re all Chinese goalkeepers. For example, Liu Dianzuo has had several team changes and is a key player, while Yan Junling is with Shanghai Port, and Hou Sen is with Beijing Guoan.Clarifying player status and data options
I realized that there's some uncertainty about Li Hao's club situation; he’s a goalkeeper for Shandong Taishan and was possibly on loan at Nantong Zhiyun. Given this ambiguity, it might be best not to state club names or make future predictions about 2025 stats. I should ask the user if they want more info and offer to create a comparison table if they provide more details. I can also suggest evaluating metrics for the Golden Glove, like clean sheets and save percentages, and check if they want me to look up the official list.Crafting a response framework

I can create an analysis framework and ask the user which angle they'd like me to take. I’ll keep it concise with crisp bullet points and respond in Chinese, adhering to presentation guidelines without heavy formatting unless necessary.
I’ll say the following: "This message is about the candidate list. Due to my knowledge cutoff in October 2024, I can’t confirm the 2025 list unless you want me to check for official sources." If they don’t need me to verify online, I can list key indicators and summarize stats for goalkeepers, while ensuring I don’t fabricate any information.Refining the response strategy

I think a better approach is to ask the user a clarifying question and provide options for what they want. I could offer a quick scouting capsule for each player without risking inaccuracies related to club details, like describing their skills in general terms.

In my concise Chinese response, I’d confirm their needs—whether they want to verify the news, complete the list, evaluate candidates, or do data comparisons. If they prefer, I can fetch the latest official shortlist and outline the analysis checklist. I could also suggest creating a small table if they provide data or allow me to access the web.
你是想了解这条候选名单的真实性、补全官方完整名单,还是做几位门将的对比与预测?
可选帮你做的事:
- 查证与来源:核对2025中国金手套完整候选、评选规则、评审机构与时间线(可提供权威链接)
- 数据对比:按近两季关键指标做横评(零封、每90分钟失球、扑救率、PSxG prevented、出击/高空球成功率、脚下传球与长传成功率、失误导致丢球)
- 技术画像:每位候选的风格标签与优势/风险点,适配不同防线形态(高位线/低位收缩)
- 获奖条件与概率:基于球队防守强度、稳定性与关键战表现给出区间判断与“必须满足”的情景
说明:我的知识截止到2024-10,无法直接确认2025最新名单。如果你需要,我可以现在联网查官方公布并给你完整名单与来源;或者先基于你给出的这几位,做一份分析框架和对比模板。你更需要哪种?
